Here are articles including those concerning the 3rd presidential debate. All the below links are in English.
You can check out the following website for policies: worldsolutions.work
標記第3回(於:@UNLV)などに関する記事を取り急ぎ以下貼っておきます。政策については上記URLをご覧ください。(本投稿一番下に私見を書きました。)
Linguist Geoffrey Nunberg on election language (YouTube) | UC Berkeley School of Information
Arizona leans HRC; McMullin rises in the west; dark red states take on lighter hue | Larry Sabato, Kyle Kondik and Geoffrey Skelley, Sabato’s Crystal Ball, University of Virginia Center for Politics
Post-debate poll: Clinton 49%, Trump 39% (w PDF) | YouGovUS
Clinton Tops Trump By 7 Points, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Most Voters Say Media Is Biased Against Trump
White House Watch: Down to the Wire? | Rasmussen Reports
How Does the U.S. Stock Market Perform in Election Years? | JEFF DESJARDINS, Visual Capitalist
Presidential Debate: What you missed | Alexander Burns & Matt Flegenheimer, New York Times
Final Presidential Debate: Live Analysis of Clinton vs. Trump | Wall Street Journal
Third Presidential Debate: 7 Moments That Mattered | SHUSHANNAH WALSHE, MEGHAN KENEALLY, VERONICA STRACQUALURSI & RYAN STRUYK, ABC news
Most Memorable Lines of the 3rd Presidential Debate | ADAM KELSEY, ABC news
Watch: Trump Won’t Commit To Accepting Election Results In Final Debate | JESSICA TAYLOR, NPR
What Went Down In The Third Presidential Debate | FiveThirtyEight
This Can Be Hillary Clinton’s Secret Weapon In Tonight’s Debate | Brian Uzzi, Fortune, Kellogg School
Donald Trump and America’s Incomplete Contract with Itself | Mark Harrison, University of Warwick
Is America collapsing like the Roman Empire? | Barry Strauss, Fox news, CornellCAS
The Axe Files (Podcast): Ep. 88 – Ron Brownstein | David Axelrod, CNN, UChicago Politics
Clinton maintains double-digit (51% vs. 36%) lead over Trump | PRRI/Brookings Survey
Clinton’s Florida Lead Continues to Grow | PublicPolicyPolling
WashU Expert: Losing hurts in partisan politics | Erika Ebsworth-Goold
Covering Immigration and the Election (YouTube) | Stanford CCSRE
Has Trump caused white Evangelicals to change their tune on morality? | William A. Galston, Brookings Institution
Marcus Noland commentary: Trade war would yield Ohio casualties | The Columbus Dispatch, PIIE
For Clinton, a Daily Dose of Faith Along With Politics | JOCELYN NOVECK, AP, ABC news, Duke Divinity School
Guns and race: The different worlds of black and white Americans | Richard V. Reeves and Sarah Holmes, Brookings Institution
A wall against clear thinking on immigration and policing | Vanda Felbab-Brown, Brookings Institution
The Russian Group Hacking US Elections | Sheera Frenkel, Buzzfeed
3 reasons Russia’s Vladimir Putin might want to interfere in the U.S. presidential elections | Fiona Hill, Brookings Institution
‘Bad Hombres’ Reactions Dominate the 65 Best Tweets from the Presidential Debate | ANGELA WATERCUTTER, Wired
THE THIRD PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: LIVE-DRAWING BY JASON ADAM KATZENSTEIN | The New Yorker
The definitive ranking of presidential (and VP) debate moderators | Carly Mallenbaum, USA Today
Presidential debate moderator Chris Wallace says it’s not his job to be the “truth squad” | Tara Golshan, Vox
A PARLIAMENT OF ELECTION EXPERTS | MICHAEL HARDY, Rice Magazine, Baker Institute
Election 2016: Civility and Family Dynamics (Radio) | LYDIA BROWN & LUCY NALPATHANCHIL, WNPR (Keith J. Bybee, MaxwellSU & SUCollegeofLaw, SyracuseUNews)
Donald Trump: How To Invest In The Stock Market If He Wins The Election | Ky Trang Ho, Forbes (Gerry Jensen, Heider College of Business) http://www.forbes.com/sites/trangho/2016/10/17/donald-trump-how-to-invest-in-the-stock-market-if-he-wins-the-election/#2c813c165b24
HOW VOTER TURNOUT COULD PUT TRUMP IN THE WHITE HOUSE | Christine Gallagher, Oxford University Politics Blog
Stony Brook University Professor Norpoth: Trump Still Has 87% of Winning November Election (YouTube) | James Hoft, Fox news
Expert: Rigging the presidential election would be “impossible” | Bailey Harbit, WSAW
Events across campus to spotlight Election 2016, before and after | Jose Garcia Jr., Brown University
私見:10月4日の副大統領候補者テレビ討論会の後、10月7日にトランプ候補の10年以上前の問題発言が公になったのが、大きな分かれ目でしょう。
政治ですから、この時期に公になり火が付いたのは不可思議ということもありません。また、白人既婚女性が対象となるなど限界を超えた感があり、テフロン加工が剥がれたようです。さらに、初の選挙出馬で公職経験も無い挑戦者という立場は、年齢が高くてもフレッシュさは満点で期待を集めますが、強い信頼関係の下で助けてくれる人材が不足し、それを自分の口一つでカバーするというのも限界があります。しかも、その舞台がアメリカ大統領選挙本選という世界最大の選挙ですから、無理なのかもしれません。それでも、既存政治家への不満や不信が国民に渦巻いているとは言え、共和党という二大政党の大統領選挙の予備選挙を勝ち抜いただけでも凄いことではあります。
討論会だけを見ると、多くの勝者投票結果などと異なるかもしれませんが、10月9日の2回目は超逆境ながら何とかやりすごすタフさを見せましたが、1回目は口数も悪態ももう少し大人しくして政策批判や政策主張の中で挑戦者らしく内容や根拠にもっと具体的に踏み込むのが良かったであろうし、3回目の今回は全てに一番新味に欠け全然魅力ある政権を想像させませんでした。他方、クリントン候補は、1回目の特に冒頭は疲れか緊張感があるようにも感じられましたし、2回目も決して楽な感じを受けませんでしたが、相手や場に慣れてくると徐々に底力が出てきたのか、3回目の今回は現職大統領のように全てに強く見えました。
選挙ですから、最後まで予断を許しません。投票により選ばれた大統領が、アメリカ国民に喜ばれつつ日本との一層の関係深化へも進み、両国の共存共栄が深まる、そんな方であることを祈念しております。